delivered for clients · names withheldAI rollout AI and agents

AI pilot to production with forward deployed engineers

Cohash takes AI pilots into production with forward deployed engineers who sit with the business team that will actually use the thing. They narrow the pilot to one workflow you can measure and build an eval set from real cases. The workflow gets connected to live systems through scoped identities, with human review wherever a mistake would be expensive, plus tracing and cost limits. Then it goes to a named owner, along with runbooks and tests that keep running after we leave.

  1. 01One workflow, one measure
  2. 02Eval set from real cases
  3. 03Real systems, scoped identities
  4. 04Human review where it counts
  5. 05Tracing, cost and model changes
  6. 06Handover
case-study / ai-pilot-to-production delivered
beforeAI pilot or proof of concept afterProduction AI workflow with evals and an owner
01 · BUSINESS SYSTEMS 02 · AI WORKFLOW 03 · CONTROL System of record: claims · cases · tickets System of record claims · cases ·tickets MCP servers: scoped tools MCP servers scoped tools Production workflow: own identity · narrow scopes Production workflow own identity · narrowscopes Model platform: Bedrock · Foundry · Vertex AI Model platform Bedrock · Foundry ·Vertex AI Human review queue: costly or irreversible actions Human review queue costly or irreversibleactions Eval suite in CI: real cases · edge cases Eval suite in CI real cases · edgecases Tracing and cost limits: retrieval · model · tool calls Tracing and costlimits retrieval · model ·tool calls
case file

The story

Told without the client's name or anything that could identify them.

what happened

An insurer's claims operations team had an AI pilot that impressed leadership, then sat in a sandbox running on a personal API key and a copy of production data. Nobody could say how often it was right, and it was built on an agent service that was being retired. Our forward deployed engineers sat with the claims team, agreed on one workflow and one success measure, and built an eval set from real cases before touching the prompt. We replaced copied data with live API and MCP connections under the workflow's own identity, added human review for costly decisions, and set up tracing and spend limits. The business owner and an internal engineering team now run it, with the eval suite running in CI.

why it was urgent

Agent platforms have matured and older ones are closing. AWS made Bedrock AgentCore generally available on 13 October 2025 and closed Bedrock Agents Classic to new customers on 30 July 2026. Microsoft retires Foundry Workflows on 1 December 2026, and OpenAI shuts down Agent Builder on 30 November 2026. A pilot built on a retiring service has to move anyway.

problem statement
  • openThe demo impressed leadership months ago. It still runs on someone's laptop, or in a sandbox.
  • recurringNobody can say how often the pilot is right, because there's no test set.
  • blockedThe pilot uses a personal API key and a copy of production data.
  • openIt was built on a service that's now closed to new customers or scheduled to retire.
architecture

The estate, before and after

before
before

Before: a pilot in a sandbox

The pilot ran on a copy of production data with a personal API key, on an agent service scheduled to retire. There was no eval set, no tracing and no owner outside the people who built the demo.

Before: a pilot in a sandbox The pilot ran on a copy of production data with a personal API key, on an agent service scheduled to retire. There was no eval set, no tracing and no owner outside the people who built the demo. 01 · INPUTS 02 · PILOT 03 · USERS manual export auth agent calls demo output Copied production data exported sample · no refresh Personal API key shared by the pilot team Pilot notebook or app sandbox · no eval set Retiring agent service closed to new customers Leadership demo hand-picked examples
Read the diagram as text
  1. Copied production data → Pilot notebook or app: manual export
  2. Personal API key → Pilot notebook or app: auth
  3. Pilot notebook or app → Retiring agent service: agent calls
  4. Pilot notebook or app → Leadership demo: demo output
after
after

After: one workflow in production with evals and an owner

The workflow reads live systems through APIs and MCP servers under its own scoped identity, routes costly decisions to a reviewer and traces every request. The eval suite runs in CI so prompt and model changes are scored before release.

After: one workflow in production with evals and an owner The workflow reads live systems through APIs and MCP servers under its own scoped identity, routes costly decisions to a reviewer and traces every request. The eval suite runs in CI so prompt and model changes are scored before release. 01 · BUSINESS SYSTEMS 02 · AI WORKFLOW 03 · CONTROL API reads tool calls prompt · response flagged outputs reviewer feedback release gate traces · spend approved update SE System of record claims · cases ·tickets MCP servers scoped tools Production workflow own identity · narrow scopes AW Model platform Bedrock · Foundry ·Vertex AI Human review queue costly or irreversibleactions Eval suite in CI real cases · edge cases Tracing and cost limits retrieval · model · toolcalls
Read the diagram as text
  1. System of record → Production workflow: API reads
  2. MCP servers → Production workflow: tool calls
  3. Production workflow → Model platform: prompt · response
  4. Production workflow → Human review queue: flagged outputs
  5. Human review queue → Eval suite in CI: reviewer feedback
  6. Eval suite in CI → Production workflow: release gate
  7. Production workflow → Tracing and cost limits: traces · spend
  8. Human review queue → System of record: approved update
results

What the client got

What changed for the client once the work was done. Described, not scored: we don't publish client figures.

  1. result 01

    The workflow is scored on real cases

    We built the eval set from real inputs and expected outputs, hard and edge cases included, and it runs in CI. Every prompt change or model upgrade gets scored against that same set.

  2. result 02

    No more personal keys or copied data

    The workflow has its own identity, uses user-delegated tokens where an action belongs to a person, and reaches live systems through APIs or MCP servers with narrow scopes.

  3. result 03

    People review the decisions that cost the most

    Outputs are split into straight-through and human-reviewed by cost of error. Reviewer corrections feed back into the eval set.

  4. result 04

    A model retirement is just another eval run

    Requests are traced through retrieval, model calls and tool use, spend limits are set, and a model retirement plan means a forced change gets scored before it ships.

  5. result 05

    A named owner runs it

    The business owner and an engineering team signed off on handover with runbooks, dashboards and a documented change path.

what can go wrong

Risks we plan for

  1. Demo data versus real data

    Pilots tend to run on clean samples. Real inputs are messier, so quality usually drops at first. Expect that, and measure it.

  2. No baseline

    Without an eval set you're guessing. Nobody can say whether the last prompt change or model upgrade made anything better or worse.

  3. Forced model changes

    Models get retired on a schedule. Gemini 2.5 models go on 20 October 2026, Google says. Without evals, each of those dates turns into a fire drill.

  4. No owner after launch

    If the engineers who built it leave and nobody in the business owns it, the workflow decays. Ownership is agreed before production, not after.

ai in this move

Where AI helps, and where it needs guardrails

Forward deployed engineers were Palantir's model first. Now OpenAI and Anthropic hire them as well, and send them to put models into production with customers. The cloud agent platforms have added evaluation and policy controls on their side, and AgentCore Evaluations has been generally available since 31 March 2026. We give each production agent its own identity and scoped access to MCP servers. A person approves anything irreversible.

forward deployed engineers →
you keep

What you're left with

We write these for your setup, and they're working documents. Your team should be able to keep things running from them long after we've gone.

  • document01

    Workflow definition with a success measure agreed by the business owner

    yours to keep
  • document02

    Eval set from real cases, wired into CI

    yours to keep
  • document03

    Production integration with scoped identities and approval steps

    yours to keep
  • document04

    Tracing, cost limits and alerting

    yours to keep
  • runbook05

    Runbooks, model retirement plan and handover sign-off

    yours to keep
talent and delivery · production ai workflow with evals and an owner

Certified engineers, wherever you need them.

Some clients want a project team, some want a couple of engineers on theirs. Either works. Onsite, nearshore or offshore, with handovers across time zones that keep things moving.

Onsite

Engineers at your sites in the US

Nearshore

Overlapping hours with US teams

Offshore

Overnight progress on your backlog

All time zones

Coverage handed over across time zones

24-hour coverage · US Central time
OnsiteUS business hours
Nearshoreoverlapping US hours
Offshoreovernight progress
Combinedhandover, not hand-off
01What does a forward deployed engineer do that a regular consultant doesn't?

They sit with the business team and work on its real data and systems. They ship working software instead of a deck of recommendations, and until handover, whether the workflow actually works is on them.

02How long does it take to get a pilot into production?

It depends on how many systems it touches, how clean the data is and how much human review the risk needs. A first eval run shows the gap between pilot and production quality, which turns into a real estimate.

03Should we rebuild on a different model or platform?

Only when there's a reason to, like a retiring service, missing controls or cost. With an eval set you can compare the options on your own cases instead of on benchmarks.

04Who owns it after you leave?

You'll need a named business owner and an engineering team. We settle that before production, and at handover they get the runbooks, dashboards and eval suite.

sources 9 sources linked last checked 2026-10-20 content fingerprint 420b2221
  1. 01Palantir careers: Forward Deployed Software Engineerjobs.lever.co ↗
  2. 02OpenAI careers: Forward Deployed Engineerjobs.ashbyhq.com ↗
  3. 03Anthropic careers: Forward Deployed Engineerjob-boards.greenhouse.io ↗
  4. 04AWS What's New: AgentCore generally available (13 Oct 2025)aws.amazon.com ↗
  5. 05AWS What's New: AgentCore Evaluations GA (31 Mar 2026)aws.amazon.com ↗
  6. 06Amazon Bedrock User Guide: document history (Agents Classic)docs.aws.amazon.com ↗
  7. 07Microsoft Learn: Foundry general availability and feature statuslearn.microsoft.com ↗
  8. 08OpenAI API deprecationsdevelopers.openai.com ↗
  9. 09Google Cloud: Model versions and lifecycledocs.cloud.google.com ↗
Reviewed by the Cohash team Product names are trademarks of their owners. how we handle facts and data →
next step

Planning this move?

A 30-minute working session with a senior engineer. No slides.

useful to bring
  • The platform and the version you're on
  • Where you need to get to, and by when
  • What's custom: rules, plugins, integrations
  • Any audit finding or deadline driving it