ai and machine learning · forward deployed engineering

Our engineers sit with your claims team until the AI workflow runs in production.

The pilot ran on a spreadsheet export. Production is the real policy system, its permissions, and the people who'll be using it on Monday. Our forward deployed engineers join your business team and build on your systems and data, and once they leave your own engineers run it.

platforms
ai-machine-learning / forward-deployed-engineering 8 platforms
01 · BUSINESS TEAM 02 · EMBEDDED BUILD 03 · MODEL AND IDENTITY 04 · SYSTEMS OF RECORD Claims or service team: real cases · edge cases Claims or serviceteam real cases · edgecases Business owner: acceptance bar · sign-off Business owner acceptance bar ·sign-off Forward deployed engineer: discovery · build · ship Forward deployedengineer discovery · build ·ship Eval set: graded real cases Eval set graded real cases AI workflow: intake · triage · draft AI workflow intake · triage ·draft Model platform: Bedrock · Foundry · Vertex AI Model platform Bedrock · Foundry ·Vertex AI Service identity: scoped OAuth client Service identity scoped OAuth client CRM: Salesforce CRM Salesforce Ticketing: ServiceNow Ticketing ServiceNow Traces and dashboards: cost · latency · errors Traces anddashboards cost · latency ·errors
Anthropic ClaudeOpenAI APIAmazon BedrockMicrosoft Foundry
in short·15-second read

A forward deployed engineer is a software engineer who joins a business team and ships working systems on that team's real data and applications.

Ours build production AI workflows, such as document intake, case triage or agent-assisted service. Each workflow comes with an evaluation suite and least-privilege access to your systems. We document the handover so your team can run and change it after we leave.

you probably need this if
  • The AI pilot demoed well on exported data but nobody has connected it to the real system.
  • The platform team builds AI features, but nobody has sat with the people who'll use them.
  • Every new AI use case waits months in a queue for a central team.
Ask an engineer facts checked 2026-10-20 · 5 sources
how it runs
  1. 01Embed and pick one workflow
  2. 02Build the eval set first
  3. 03Ship to a small group
  4. 04Hand over and move on
you keep
  • Workflow map with real examples and edge cases gathered from the team
  • Evaluation set with expected outcomes and a grading rubric
  • Production integration code in your repository
+ 3 more documents
who does it
Forward deployed AI engineerAI integration engineer (APIs and service identities)Evaluation engineer for LLM workflows AWS Certified Generative AI Developer - Professional Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Apps and Agents Developer Associate
the story · forward deployed engineers

From the first call to a setup your own team can run.

Here's what usually prompts a call about your Forward Deployed Engineers, what we do about it and in which order, and where you end up.

  1. chapter 01 · where it hurts

    Why teams reach out

    • The AI pilot demoed well on exported data but nobody has connected it to the real system.
    • The platform team builds AI features, but nobody has sat with the people who'll use them.
    • Every new AI use case waits months in a queue for a central team.
  2. chapter 02 · what we change

    How we solve it

    • Embedded discovery with the people doing the work
    • Building against real systems
    • Evaluation before launch
    • Access controls for models and agents
    • Production operations from day one
    • Handover to your engineers
  3. chapter 03 · how it runs

    Our approach

    • Embed and pick one workflow
    • Build the eval set first
    • Ship to a small group
    • Hand over and move on
  4. chapter 04 · where you end up

    What changes

    • Each submission now arrives in the policy system as a draft for an assistant to check and submit.
    • Answers come with citations and only use content the agent is allowed to open.
    • Workflow map with real examples and edge cases gathered from the team
    • Evaluation set with expected outcomes and a grading rubric
what we do

Where we spend the hours

6 areas of work, each one done by an engineer who has run it in production.

  1. We sit with the team whose work changes, watch the current process, collect real examples and the edge cases people handle from memory, and agree a narrow first workflow with a measurable definition of done.

  2. Integrations with your CRM, policy, claims, ERP or ticketing systems through their APIs, with the same identity and network controls as any other production service. No shadow copies of data on a laptop.

  3. A test set built from real cases and graded by your subject matter experts runs every time a prompt, model or retrieval setting changes. Until it clears the business owner's bar, nothing ships.

  4. We gave each workflow its own service identity and scoped permissions, made retrieval respect the user's document access, and added approval steps for anything that writes to a system of record.

  5. Tracing, cost and latency dashboards, error alerts and a fallback path to the manual process. When something breaks at 2 a.m., the runbook says who gets paged and what to switch off.

  6. Your developers pair with ours during the build. They own the repository and run the last releases themselves, and we finish with code, evals, runbooks and a named internal owner.

capability 01 / 06in production

Embedded discovery with the people doing the work

We sit with the team whose work changes, watch the current process, collect real examples and the edge cases people handle from memory, and agree a narrow first workflow with a measurable definition of done.

capability 02 / 06in production

Building against real systems

Integrations with your CRM, policy, claims, ERP or ticketing systems through their APIs, with the same identity and network controls as any other production service. No shadow copies of data on a laptop.

capability 03 / 06in production

Evaluation before launch

A test set built from real cases and graded by your subject matter experts runs every time a prompt, model or retrieval setting changes. Until it clears the business owner's bar, nothing ships.

capability 04 / 06in production

Access controls for models and agents

We gave each workflow its own service identity and scoped permissions, made retrieval respect the user's document access, and added approval steps for anything that writes to a system of record.

capability 05 / 06in production

Production operations from day one

Tracing, cost and latency dashboards, error alerts and a fallback path to the manual process. When something breaks at 2 a.m., the runbook says who gets paged and what to switch off.

capability 06 / 06in production

Handover to your engineers

Your developers pair with ours during the build. They own the repository and run the last releases themselves, and we finish with code, evals, runbooks and a named internal owner.

typical situations

Situations we walk into

We pieced these together from Forward Deployed Engineers situations that come up a lot. They're patterns. You won't find a specific client in them.

case file 01

Commercial insurance submissions keyed by hand from broker emails

composite · not a client story
  1. Beforethe situation

    Underwriting assistants are retyping broker submission emails and attachments into the policy admin system by hand. There was a pilot that extracted fields from sample PDFs. It never ran against the live mailbox or the policy system's API.

  2. What we dothe work

    Sit with the assistants for two weeks and collect a few hundred real submissions with the fields they actually key. Build the eval set from those, connect the mailbox and the policy API through a scoped service account, and route low-confidence extractions to a human queue.

  3. Afterwhere you end up

    Each submission now arrives in the policy system as a draft for an assistant to check and submit. Nobody retypes any more. They work the exceptions queue, and the eval set catches regressions before changes ship.

case file 02

Service agents copying answers between five knowledge bases

composite · not a client story
  1. Beforethe situation

    Every call means searching several knowledge bases and old ticket notes. A central team built a chatbot for the agents. They don't trust it. It answers from documents they can't see and cites nothing.

  2. What we dothe work

    Embed with a team lead and log the questions agents actually ask. Rebuild retrieval so results follow each agent's document permissions, require citations in every answer, and grade a sample of real calls with senior agents each week.

  3. Afterwhere you end up

    Answers come with citations and only use content the agent is allowed to open. Senior agents do the grading. The quality bar belongs to the floor, not to IT.

case studies

Forward Deployed Engineers case studies

All case studies
AI rollout AI and agents

AI pilot to production with forward deployed engineers

Taking an AI pilot into production with forward deployed engineers who work with the business team, build evals, connect real systems and hand over cleanly.

read the case study
AI rollout AI and agents

Microsoft 365 Copilot or Gemini Enterprise rollout with real adoption

Rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot or Gemini Enterprise with oversharing fixed first, use cases tied to real tasks and adoption measured past login counts.

read the case study
AI rollout AI and agents

Enterprise search and RAG that respects document permissions

Enterprise search and RAG that only return what each user may open. We capture source ACLs at ingestion, filter at query time and leak-test.

read the case study
implementation Industry platforms

Epic integrations, FHIR APIs and TEFCA connectivity

Building and governing the HL7 and FHIR integrations, SMART on FHIR apps and TEFCA exchange around Epic, with an interface catalog and scope reviews.

read the case study
AI rollout AI and agents

MCP servers for SAP, Salesforce, ServiceNow and internal APIs

We connect AI agents to SAP, Salesforce, ServiceNow and internal APIs through MCP servers, with OAuth, scoped tools, approval for writes and audit.

read the case study
upgrade AI and agents

OpenAI Assistants API to the Responses API and the Agents SDK

Getting apps off the shut-down OpenAI Assistants API onto the Responses and Conversations APIs or the Agents SDK, with history kept and outputs re-tested.

read the case study
architecture

Where a forward deployed engineer sits between the business and your systems

Our engineer sits with the business team, turning real cases into an eval set and a workflow. The workflow calls a model through your AI platform. It gets to systems of record through a scoped service identity, and traces and eval results flow back to the owners.

Where a forward deployed engineer sits between the business and your systems Our engineer sits with the business team, turning real cases into an eval set and a workflow. The workflow calls a model through your AI platform. It gets to systems of record through a scoped service identity, and traces and eval results flow back to the owners. 01 · BUSINESS TEAM 02 · EMBEDDED BUILD 03 · MODEL AND IDENTITY 04 · SYSTEMS OF RECORD examples build grade gate releases inference token scoped API calls create task traces weekly review Claims or service team real cases · edge cases Business owner acceptance bar · sign-off Forward deployedengineer discovery · build · ship Eval set graded real cases AI workflow intake · triage · draft AW Model platform Bedrock · Foundry ·Vertex AI Service identity scoped OAuth client Sf CRM Salesforce SE Ticketing ServiceNow Traces and dashboards cost · latency · errors
Read the diagram as text
  1. Claims or service team → Forward deployed engineer: examples
  2. Forward deployed engineer → Eval set: build
  3. Business owner → Eval set: grade
  4. Eval set → AI workflow: gate releases
  5. AI workflow → Model platform: inference
  6. AI workflow → Service identity: token
  7. Service identity → CRM: scoped API calls
  8. Service identity → Ticketing: create task
  9. AI workflow → Traces and dashboards: traces
  10. Traces and dashboards → Business owner: weekly review
how it runs

A typical engagement

We don't start a step until the last one has produced something you can check.

  1. step 01

    Embed and pick one workflow

    Two to three weeks with the business team to map the work, gather examples and pick the first workflow by volume, risk and how easy it is to check the output.

  2. step 02

    Build the eval set first

    Real cases with expected outcomes, reviewed by the business owner. This becomes the acceptance test and the regression suite.

  3. step 03

    Ship to a small group

    Integrate with production under scoped access. Roll out to a few users and review every output by hand, then widen the rollout as long as eval results and user feedback hold up.

  4. step 04

    Hand over and move on

    Your engineers run the releases. The runbook is tested, then we either leave or start the next workflow with your team in the lead.

you keep

What you're left with

We write these for your Forward Deployed Engineers setup, and they're working documents. Your team should be able to keep things running from them long after we've gone.

  • document01

    Workflow map with real examples and edge cases gathered from the team

    yours to keep
  • document02

    Evaluation set with expected outcomes and a grading rubric

    yours to keep
  • code03

    Production integration code in your repository

    yours to keep
  • design04

    Service identity and permission design for each workflow

    yours to keep
  • runbook05

    Monitoring dashboards, alerts and an incident runbook

    yours to keep
  • document06

    Handover sessions and a named internal owner

    yours to keep
talent and delivery · forward deployed engineers

Certified engineers, wherever you need them.

Some clients want a project team, some want a couple of engineers on theirs. Either works. Onsite, nearshore or offshore, with handovers across time zones that keep things moving.

Onsite

Engineers at your sites in the US

Nearshore

Overlapping hours with US teams

Offshore

Overnight progress on your backlog

All time zones

Coverage handed over across time zones

24-hour coverage · US Central time
OnsiteUS business hours
Nearshoreoverlapping US hours
Offshoreovernight progress
Combinedhandover, not hand-off
roles we staff
  • Forward deployed AI engineer
  • AI integration engineer (APIs and service identities)
  • Evaluation engineer for LLM workflows
  • Retrieval and search engineer
  • Delivery lead embedded with the business team
01How is a forward deployed engineer different from a consultant or a contractor?

A consultant often recommends and a contractor builds to a spec. A forward deployed engineer works out the spec with the business team and then builds and ships it, sitting with the users while they do. The job is measured on a working system in production.

02Where did the forward deployed model come from?

Palantir, mostly. Its Forward Deployed Software Engineers work directly with customers to understand and solve their biggest problems. Frontier AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic included, now hire forward deployed engineers as well, to put their models into production with customers.

03How long does an engagement last?

The first workflow usually takes a few months from embedding to handover, depending on how many systems it touches, how clean the data is and how fast access gets approved. Access approvals are often the longest wait, so we request them in week one.

04Which model or AI platform do you use?

That's decided by your contracts, data residency rules and security review. We work with Claude, OpenAI models, Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry and Google Vertex AI. Run the eval set first and you can compare them on your own cases before committing.

05Do the engineers need to be onsite?

For discovery, it helps a lot to be in the room with the people doing the work. Build work can be nearshore or offshore once the workflow and the evals are agreed. We plan the split at the start.

06What if the first workflow turns out not to be worth automating?

Then we say so early, usually during the eval-set work, when it becomes clear the output can't be checked reliably or the volume is too low. Stopping a weak workflow in week three costs less than shipping it.

related

Often paired with

Projects on Forward Deployed Engineers usually end up touching one of these, so they're worth a look.

next step

Tell us what you're running. We'll tell you what we'd do first.

A 30-minute working session with a senior engineer. No slides.

useful to bring
  • The platform and the version you're on
  • Where you need to get to, and by when
  • What's custom: rules, plugins, integrations
  • Any audit finding or deadline driving it